info@checkyourstudy.com
ME4575/5575 Renewable and Alternative Energy Fall 2015 Project 1 In this project, you will design a two piston Stirling engine (as in the example given in the class) of 1 kW power. The engine will be operated at TH=650 0C. The waste energy will be rejected at the temperature of TC=40 0C. The objective of the design is to maximize the efficiency and minimize the system weight. For the given temperature ratio, you have to select and optimize the piston diameter and piston stroke. The weight is proximately equal to the hot and cold piston volume multiplying by steel density. You can use Excel spreadsheet (or other engineering software) to create a Stirling modeling file to iterate on the piston diameter and stroke until the best combination of efficiency and weight (cost) is achieved. The project report has to contain a short introduction, technical description of the problem, details of analyses, and final conclusion of the design (size, weight, and efficiency).

## ME4575/5575 Renewable and Alternative Energy Fall 2015 Project 1 In this project, you will design a two piston Stirling engine (as in the example given in the class) of 1 kW power. The engine will be operated at TH=650 0C. The waste energy will be rejected at the temperature of TC=40 0C. The objective of the design is to maximize the efficiency and minimize the system weight. For the given temperature ratio, you have to select and optimize the piston diameter and piston stroke. The weight is proximately equal to the hot and cold piston volume multiplying by steel density. You can use Excel spreadsheet (or other engineering software) to create a Stirling modeling file to iterate on the piston diameter and stroke until the best combination of efficiency and weight (cost) is achieved. The project report has to contain a short introduction, technical description of the problem, details of analyses, and final conclusion of the design (size, weight, and efficiency).

Need help in Engineering Ethicks , due in 2 hours , and it is essay with one and half to two hand written paper. Essay one : Alan Dengson, John Dewey, Lewis Mumford, and Jessica Wooliams view technology as ” instrumental ‘ . what does it mean, generally speaking, to regard technology as instrumental rather than intrinsically valuable? with respect to two of the aforementioned authors, answer the following questions: 2- what are the moral dangers associated with losing sight of the instrumental value of technology? 1- why is it important, morally speaking, to affirm the instrumental value of technology? Outline: I. thesis statement: what is your overall argument? Three sentences or less II. instrumental VS. intrinsic Goods. – what an instrumental good is. – what an intrinsic good is. – An example of each -what it means to regard technology as either kind of good – An example of what happend when technology is regarded as intrinsically good III. Importance of affirming the instrumental value of technology. – How doe viewing technology in this light make us better off? _Examples – How does viewing technology as intrinsically good make us worse off? – Example IV. conclusion: summary of your previous point, 5 sentence or less Essay two: Aldo Leopold claims that we have a moral duty to protect the biotic community of which we are a part. What are the arguments in favor of this claim? in your view, is this te extension of moral respect to the natural environment a natural progression of mankind’s tendency to expand the scope of the ” moral community” Why or why not? Are there practical and/ or theoretical problems with this philosophical position regarding our duties to the environment? Outline : I. Thesis Statement : What is your overall argument? Three sentences or less. II. anthropological and Darwinian Bases of Leopold’s Argument. – What Leopold through early human societies were like morally – Leopold’s view of moral progress – Examples – How care for the environment forms of a part of moral progress for Leopold III. The limits of moral community, -How might adhering to Leopold’s argument negatively impact human beings? – how might it positively impact human beings as well as the environment ? – Examples IV: Conclusion: Summary of your previous point.

## Need help in Engineering Ethicks , due in 2 hours , and it is essay with one and half to two hand written paper. Essay one : Alan Dengson, John Dewey, Lewis Mumford, and Jessica Wooliams view technology as ” instrumental ‘ . what does it mean, generally speaking, to regard technology as instrumental rather than intrinsically valuable? with respect to two of the aforementioned authors, answer the following questions: 2- what are the moral dangers associated with losing sight of the instrumental value of technology? 1- why is it important, morally speaking, to affirm the instrumental value of technology? Outline: I. thesis statement: what is your overall argument? Three sentences or less II. instrumental VS. intrinsic Goods. – what an instrumental good is. – what an intrinsic good is. – An example of each -what it means to regard technology as either kind of good – An example of what happend when technology is regarded as intrinsically good III. Importance of affirming the instrumental value of technology. – How doe viewing technology in this light make us better off? _Examples – How does viewing technology as intrinsically good make us worse off? – Example IV. conclusion: summary of your previous point, 5 sentence or less Essay two: Aldo Leopold claims that we have a moral duty to protect the biotic community of which we are a part. What are the arguments in favor of this claim? in your view, is this te extension of moral respect to the natural environment a natural progression of mankind’s tendency to expand the scope of the ” moral community” Why or why not? Are there practical and/ or theoretical problems with this philosophical position regarding our duties to the environment? Outline : I. Thesis Statement : What is your overall argument? Three sentences or less. II. anthropological and Darwinian Bases of Leopold’s Argument. – What Leopold through early human societies were like morally – Leopold’s view of moral progress – Examples – How care for the environment forms of a part of moral progress for Leopold III. The limits of moral community, -How might adhering to Leopold’s argument negatively impact human beings? – how might it positively impact human beings as well as the environment ? – Examples IV: Conclusion: Summary of your previous point.

info@checkyourstudy.com
Read and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each of these business cases with reference to the Business Case framework described by Gamble and the lecture sessions.Acting as a Board of review, document the relative merits and deficiencies of these proposals.Select the proposal that you best consider meets the needs of the region from the three business cases you reviewed. Make sure that you explain the reason(s) i.e. what decision framework or criteria you used to reach this conclusion.

## Read and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of each of these business cases with reference to the Business Case framework described by Gamble and the lecture sessions.Acting as a Board of review, document the relative merits and deficiencies of these proposals.Select the proposal that you best consider meets the needs of the region from the three business cases you reviewed. Make sure that you explain the reason(s) i.e. what decision framework or criteria you used to reach this conclusion.

info@checkyourstudy.com
Research Paper Write a 10 to 15 page research paper double spaced on some aspect of logistics systems development of the student’s choosing. Note: line spacing format for research papers is double space RESEARCH REPORT FORMAT (MUST BE IN APA FORMAT) STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: What is the format that MGT 5061 students should use in their research papers? BACKGROUND: Here each student should comment on the background of their problem. The Background may be simply an academic issue or perhaps involve real problems at work. In any event, the importance of each student’s problem needs to be discussed so the reader understands why he or she should read more about it. DISCUSSION: Now comes the part where each student must write about the research done on his or her problem. What have other experts said about the problem? This information can come from other textbooks, magazine articles, newspapers, or personal interviews. If the student wants to use his or her own experience, that is fine, but the experience must be justified as to its validity. If a comparison between alternatives is being described, the choices should be discussed here in enough detail that a conclusion can be derived as to which one is better. Whenever an information source is cited, it must be referenced by footnotes so that the reader can find exactly where the information came from and what the author of the information exactly said. The style of footnoting used is not important; what is important is that each piece of information is referenced with a page number. Last, a bibliography must be included at the end of the paper. CONCLUSIONS: Once the background research is completed, the next step is to outline the conclusions that can be substantiated from the research DISCUSSION. The substantiation must be defended by saying why the research evidence supports the conclusions that are made. RECOMMENDATIONS: This section is to be used by those students who want to solve problems. By this time, the various choices have been examined in the DISCUSSION above and one was chosen in the CONCLUSION. So, the recommendation should be a simple statement that the preferred alternative be selected with the anticipated benefits that will be derived by the recommended selection.

## Research Paper Write a 10 to 15 page research paper double spaced on some aspect of logistics systems development of the student’s choosing. Note: line spacing format for research papers is double space RESEARCH REPORT FORMAT (MUST BE IN APA FORMAT) STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: What is the format that MGT 5061 students should use in their research papers? BACKGROUND: Here each student should comment on the background of their problem. The Background may be simply an academic issue or perhaps involve real problems at work. In any event, the importance of each student’s problem needs to be discussed so the reader understands why he or she should read more about it. DISCUSSION: Now comes the part where each student must write about the research done on his or her problem. What have other experts said about the problem? This information can come from other textbooks, magazine articles, newspapers, or personal interviews. If the student wants to use his or her own experience, that is fine, but the experience must be justified as to its validity. If a comparison between alternatives is being described, the choices should be discussed here in enough detail that a conclusion can be derived as to which one is better. Whenever an information source is cited, it must be referenced by footnotes so that the reader can find exactly where the information came from and what the author of the information exactly said. The style of footnoting used is not important; what is important is that each piece of information is referenced with a page number. Last, a bibliography must be included at the end of the paper. CONCLUSIONS: Once the background research is completed, the next step is to outline the conclusions that can be substantiated from the research DISCUSSION. The substantiation must be defended by saying why the research evidence supports the conclusions that are made. RECOMMENDATIONS: This section is to be used by those students who want to solve problems. By this time, the various choices have been examined in the DISCUSSION above and one was chosen in the CONCLUSION. So, the recommendation should be a simple statement that the preferred alternative be selected with the anticipated benefits that will be derived by the recommended selection.

checkyourstudy.com Whatsapp +919891515290