You are to choose 2 websites, with different purposes, and review the websites based on the criteria listed below. 1. Starting Point a. Composition Matches Site Purpose b. Target Audience Apparent c. Composition Appropriate for Target Audience 2. Site design a. Consistency within site b. Consistency among pages 3. Visually Pleasing Composition 4. Visual Style in Web Design a. Consistency b. Distinctiveness 5. Focus and Emphasis a. What is emphasized? b. How is emphasis achieved? 6. Consistency a. Real World b. Internal 7. Navigation and Flow a. Home page identifiable throughout b. Location within site apparent c. Navigation consistent; rule-based; appropriate 8. Grouping a. Grouping with White Space b. Grouping with Borders c. Grouping with Backgrounds 9. Response time 10. Links a. Titled b. Incoming c. Outgoing d. Color 11. Detailed content a. Meaningful headings b. Plain language c. Page chunking d. Long blocks of text e. Scrolling f. Use of “within” page links 12. Articles a. Clear headings b. Plain language 13. Presenting Information Simply and Meaningfully a. Legibility b. Readability c. Information in Usable Form d. Visual Lines Clear 14. Legibility of content a. Font color b. Font size c. Font style d. Background color e. Background graphic 15. Documentation

You are to choose 2 websites, with different purposes, and review the websites based on the criteria listed below. 1. Starting Point a. Composition Matches Site Purpose b. Target Audience Apparent c. Composition Appropriate for Target Audience 2. Site design a. Consistency within site b. Consistency among pages 3. Visually Pleasing Composition 4. Visual Style in Web Design a. Consistency b. Distinctiveness 5. Focus and Emphasis a. What is emphasized? b. How is emphasis achieved? 6. Consistency a. Real World b. Internal 7. Navigation and Flow a. Home page identifiable throughout b. Location within site apparent c. Navigation consistent; rule-based; appropriate 8. Grouping a. Grouping with White Space b. Grouping with Borders c. Grouping with Backgrounds 9. Response time 10. Links a. Titled b. Incoming c. Outgoing d. Color 11. Detailed content a. Meaningful headings b. Plain language c. Page chunking d. Long blocks of text e. Scrolling f. Use of “within” page links 12. Articles a. Clear headings b. Plain language 13. Presenting Information Simply and Meaningfully a. Legibility b. Readability c. Information in Usable Form d. Visual Lines Clear 14. Legibility of content a. Font color b. Font size c. Font style d. Background color e. Background graphic 15. Documentation

http://www.physicsclassroom.com/ http://www.usa.gov/ 1.                  Starting Point a.       Composition Matches Site Purpose … Read More...
Prepare a five page (minimum) paper along with a cover page, a summary (as noted below) and reference page, on a Landmark Supreme Court Case that dealt with Aboriginal rights in Canada within the past 25 years (e.g. choose from those covered in Oct. 22rd class or another one if you find one that was not addressed but fits the criteria of a Supreme Court case that dealt with Aboriginal rights in Canada within the past 25 years). You can complete the assignment as a written paper (1.5 space/12 point font Times New Roman x 4 pages) or you can use points. In either method, provide a detailed response to each of the questions listed below. In addition to the paper that you will submit for grading, prepare a one page summary/cover page that you will present in class on November 12th and share with the other ANIS3006 students (handout, there are 18 students registered in the course). Frame your paper within the context of the following quotes: “Even when we win we lose.” (Chief Dean Sayers, Batchewana First Nation, commenting on Anishinabe experience in Canadian courts). “For the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. They may allow us to temporarily beat him at his own game, but they will never enable us to bring about genuine change. Racism and homophobia are real conditions of all our lives in this place and time. I urge each one of us here to reach down into that deep place of knowledge inside herself [himself] and touch that terror and loathing of any difference that lives here. See whose face it wears. Then the personal as the political can begin to illuminate all our choices.” (Audre Lorde, feminist) In your paper, answer this broader question: How has the case you’ve selected served to advance Anishinabe rights in Canada? Describe what was gained and consider at what cost (“Even when we win, we lose.”) Address the following, and add anything that you find significant about the case, its process, its outcome and subsequent impact: • What was the basis of the court case? • What happened (e.g. Anishinabe people charged, by who, what charge)? • Who took the issue to court (who was the claimant, against who)? • What was the basis of the claim (be specific)? How was the issue framed/presented? • Who supported the court case (locally, regionally, nationally)? How did they support it? What was the impact of their support (e.g. political, financial, public awareness, protests, etc.)? • How long did it take from initiating the claim to decision (specific dates, chronology)? • What happened? What was the lower court’s decision? How did the case move through to the Supreme Court? What was the final Supreme Court decisions? • What did the Supreme Court’s decision mean in terms of Aboriginal rights in Canada? (What was gained, what was lost)? • Anything else of note relating to the case, its process or outcome. • Answer if and how the Supreme Court decision formed the basis for changes in Canadian government policies or practice concerning Aboriginal Peoples in Canada. In other words, what has the outcome of the Supreme Court decision been to date?

Prepare a five page (minimum) paper along with a cover page, a summary (as noted below) and reference page, on a Landmark Supreme Court Case that dealt with Aboriginal rights in Canada within the past 25 years (e.g. choose from those covered in Oct. 22rd class or another one if you find one that was not addressed but fits the criteria of a Supreme Court case that dealt with Aboriginal rights in Canada within the past 25 years). You can complete the assignment as a written paper (1.5 space/12 point font Times New Roman x 4 pages) or you can use points. In either method, provide a detailed response to each of the questions listed below. In addition to the paper that you will submit for grading, prepare a one page summary/cover page that you will present in class on November 12th and share with the other ANIS3006 students (handout, there are 18 students registered in the course). Frame your paper within the context of the following quotes: “Even when we win we lose.” (Chief Dean Sayers, Batchewana First Nation, commenting on Anishinabe experience in Canadian courts). “For the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. They may allow us to temporarily beat him at his own game, but they will never enable us to bring about genuine change. Racism and homophobia are real conditions of all our lives in this place and time. I urge each one of us here to reach down into that deep place of knowledge inside herself [himself] and touch that terror and loathing of any difference that lives here. See whose face it wears. Then the personal as the political can begin to illuminate all our choices.” (Audre Lorde, feminist) In your paper, answer this broader question: How has the case you’ve selected served to advance Anishinabe rights in Canada? Describe what was gained and consider at what cost (“Even when we win, we lose.”) Address the following, and add anything that you find significant about the case, its process, its outcome and subsequent impact: • What was the basis of the court case? • What happened (e.g. Anishinabe people charged, by who, what charge)? • Who took the issue to court (who was the claimant, against who)? • What was the basis of the claim (be specific)? How was the issue framed/presented? • Who supported the court case (locally, regionally, nationally)? How did they support it? What was the impact of their support (e.g. political, financial, public awareness, protests, etc.)? • How long did it take from initiating the claim to decision (specific dates, chronology)? • What happened? What was the lower court’s decision? How did the case move through to the Supreme Court? What was the final Supreme Court decisions? • What did the Supreme Court’s decision mean in terms of Aboriginal rights in Canada? (What was gained, what was lost)? • Anything else of note relating to the case, its process or outcome. • Answer if and how the Supreme Court decision formed the basis for changes in Canadian government policies or practice concerning Aboriginal Peoples in Canada. In other words, what has the outcome of the Supreme Court decision been to date?

No expert has answered this question yet. You can browse … Read More...
PHIL 249 American Pragmatism Assignment 1 Directions: The answers to the essay questions should include a critical analysis and an in depth examination of the issue in question. A critical analysis should NOT be simply an explanation of the arguments or of the view in question but should also include your assessment of whether the author’s arguments are good (i.e. sound or cogent) or bad, and why. It should also include an explanation of your personal view and a philosophical defense of it. Format: The document should have 1-inch margins. The answer should be in Times New Roman size 12 font and double-spaced. Please write out the complete question. The questions can be single-spaced and bold. Please make sure you put your name, the assignment #, the title of the course and the date. Also number your pages. Turning in the Assignment: Students will upload their completed document to Google Drive and share it with me (Dr. Cantens). Please name your assignment “AP-Your Last Name-Assignment 1”. Introduction 1. Explain the general idea of American Pragmatism. What are some of its major themes. Explain at least five of them. Peirce: How To Make Our Ideas Clear (1878) pp. 127-150. 2. In How to Make Our Ideas Clear Peirce introduces a method that he believes if applied properly can clarify both our ideas and our beliefs. Why does he think that this method is important? Describe how the method works. What is the importance of this method for Classical American Philosophy? Can this method be applied to other disciplines? Explain how?

PHIL 249 American Pragmatism Assignment 1 Directions: The answers to the essay questions should include a critical analysis and an in depth examination of the issue in question. A critical analysis should NOT be simply an explanation of the arguments or of the view in question but should also include your assessment of whether the author’s arguments are good (i.e. sound or cogent) or bad, and why. It should also include an explanation of your personal view and a philosophical defense of it. Format: The document should have 1-inch margins. The answer should be in Times New Roman size 12 font and double-spaced. Please write out the complete question. The questions can be single-spaced and bold. Please make sure you put your name, the assignment #, the title of the course and the date. Also number your pages. Turning in the Assignment: Students will upload their completed document to Google Drive and share it with me (Dr. Cantens). Please name your assignment “AP-Your Last Name-Assignment 1”. Introduction 1. Explain the general idea of American Pragmatism. What are some of its major themes. Explain at least five of them. Peirce: How To Make Our Ideas Clear (1878) pp. 127-150. 2. In How to Make Our Ideas Clear Peirce introduces a method that he believes if applied properly can clarify both our ideas and our beliefs. Why does he think that this method is important? Describe how the method works. What is the importance of this method for Classical American Philosophy? Can this method be applied to other disciplines? Explain how?

checkyourstudy.com Whatsapp +919911743277
Human Computer Interaction You are to choose 2 websites, with different purposes, and review the websites based on the criteria listed below. 1. Starting Point a. Composition Matches Site Purpose b. Target Audience Apparent c. Composition Appropriate for Target Audience 2. Site design a. Consistency within site b. Consistency among pages 3. Visually Pleasing Composition 4. Visual Style in Web Design a. Consistency b. Distinctiveness 5. Focus and Emphasis a. What is emphasized? b. How is emphasis achieved? 6. Consistency a. Real World b. Internal 7. Navigation and Flow a. Home page identifiable throughout b. Location within site apparent c. Navigation consistent; rule-based; appropriate 8. Grouping a. Grouping with White Space b. Grouping with Borders c. Grouping with Backgrounds 9. Response time 10. Links a. Titled b. Incoming c. Outgoing d. Color 11. Detailed content a. Meaningful headings b. Plain language c. Page chunking d. Long blocks of text e. Scrolling f. Use of “within” page links 12. Articles a. Clear headings b. Plain language 13. Presenting Information Simply and Meaningfully a. Legibility b. Readability c. Information in Usable Form d. Visual Lines Clear 14. Legibility of content a. Font color b. Font size c. Font style d. Background color e. Background graphic 15. Documentation a. Included b. Searchable c. Links to difficult concepts/words 16. Multimedia a. Animation/Audio/Video/Still images b. Load time given c. Add-in required d. Quality e. Appropriateness of use 17. Scrolling and Paging a. Usage b. Appropriate? 18. Amount of Information Presented Appropriate 19. Other factors to note?

Human Computer Interaction You are to choose 2 websites, with different purposes, and review the websites based on the criteria listed below. 1. Starting Point a. Composition Matches Site Purpose b. Target Audience Apparent c. Composition Appropriate for Target Audience 2. Site design a. Consistency within site b. Consistency among pages 3. Visually Pleasing Composition 4. Visual Style in Web Design a. Consistency b. Distinctiveness 5. Focus and Emphasis a. What is emphasized? b. How is emphasis achieved? 6. Consistency a. Real World b. Internal 7. Navigation and Flow a. Home page identifiable throughout b. Location within site apparent c. Navigation consistent; rule-based; appropriate 8. Grouping a. Grouping with White Space b. Grouping with Borders c. Grouping with Backgrounds 9. Response time 10. Links a. Titled b. Incoming c. Outgoing d. Color 11. Detailed content a. Meaningful headings b. Plain language c. Page chunking d. Long blocks of text e. Scrolling f. Use of “within” page links 12. Articles a. Clear headings b. Plain language 13. Presenting Information Simply and Meaningfully a. Legibility b. Readability c. Information in Usable Form d. Visual Lines Clear 14. Legibility of content a. Font color b. Font size c. Font style d. Background color e. Background graphic 15. Documentation a. Included b. Searchable c. Links to difficult concepts/words 16. Multimedia a. Animation/Audio/Video/Still images b. Load time given c. Add-in required d. Quality e. Appropriateness of use 17. Scrolling and Paging a. Usage b. Appropriate? 18. Amount of Information Presented Appropriate 19. Other factors to note?

Human Computer Interaction You are to choose 2 websites, with … Read More...
Author Name: BIO 218 Natural History Paper General Formatting: (10%) • 1 Margins correct? • 1 Font correct? • 2 Double-spaced? • 2 Pages numbered? • 2 All sections included? • 2 At least 3 pages of text, not more than 5 pages? Project elements (50%) • Introduction: o 8 General background on topic and species (state scientific name!)? o 2 Goes from general to specific? • Review of Journal Articles: o 4 States topic and hypothesis/hypotheses described in articles? o 3 Reports how research was conducted? o 2 Describes specialized materials used? o 2 Discusses type(s) of data collected and how to be analyzed/compared/used? o 3 Reports what happened in the experiments? o 2 If comparisons made, discusses how they were made? o 2 Figure(s) reproduced and cited? o 2 Table(s) reproduced and cited? • Summary/Conclusion: o 10 Synthesizes the results of the experiments and ties the findings of the articles together? • Literature Cited: o 4 At least 3 journal articles (primary literature) used? o 2 References used in paper properly? o 2 References all listed in this section and formatted correctly? o 2 All references listed are in the body of the paper and all references in the body are listed in this section? *0.5% for each extra citation (>3) that is correctly used* Writing Elements (40%) • /15 Grammar or spelling errors? • /15 Writing is clear and flows logically throughout paper? • /10 Appropriate content in each section? Final Paper Total ( %) = /40 Comments:

Author Name: BIO 218 Natural History Paper General Formatting: (10%) • 1 Margins correct? • 1 Font correct? • 2 Double-spaced? • 2 Pages numbered? • 2 All sections included? • 2 At least 3 pages of text, not more than 5 pages? Project elements (50%) • Introduction: o 8 General background on topic and species (state scientific name!)? o 2 Goes from general to specific? • Review of Journal Articles: o 4 States topic and hypothesis/hypotheses described in articles? o 3 Reports how research was conducted? o 2 Describes specialized materials used? o 2 Discusses type(s) of data collected and how to be analyzed/compared/used? o 3 Reports what happened in the experiments? o 2 If comparisons made, discusses how they were made? o 2 Figure(s) reproduced and cited? o 2 Table(s) reproduced and cited? • Summary/Conclusion: o 10 Synthesizes the results of the experiments and ties the findings of the articles together? • Literature Cited: o 4 At least 3 journal articles (primary literature) used? o 2 References used in paper properly? o 2 References all listed in this section and formatted correctly? o 2 All references listed are in the body of the paper and all references in the body are listed in this section? *0.5% for each extra citation (>3) that is correctly used* Writing Elements (40%) • /15 Grammar or spelling errors? • /15 Writing is clear and flows logically throughout paper? • /10 Appropriate content in each section? Final Paper Total ( %) = /40 Comments:

info@checkyourstudy.com
argumentative research paper, about (death penalty) and it should have at least 6/7 quotes citation Use MLA format please observe the following guidelines: 1) As always, TIMES NEW ROMAN, 12 PT. FONT. Sorry for the all caps, but this is of the utmost importance. 2) Double spaced 5-6 pages (remember to click the little square when setting your spacing that says “don’t add a space after paragraphs of the same style. 3) No contractions (don’t, won’t, shouldn’t, etc.). 4) No 1st (I, me, my, mine, etc.) or 2nd (we, us, our, you, your, etc.) person pronouns. Keep it objective. Remember, replace yourself as the subject with your position: Instead of “I think abortion is wrong” use “Abortion is wrong because….”

argumentative research paper, about (death penalty) and it should have at least 6/7 quotes citation Use MLA format please observe the following guidelines: 1) As always, TIMES NEW ROMAN, 12 PT. FONT. Sorry for the all caps, but this is of the utmost importance. 2) Double spaced 5-6 pages (remember to click the little square when setting your spacing that says “don’t add a space after paragraphs of the same style. 3) No contractions (don’t, won’t, shouldn’t, etc.). 4) No 1st (I, me, my, mine, etc.) or 2nd (we, us, our, you, your, etc.) person pronouns. Keep it objective. Remember, replace yourself as the subject with your position: Instead of “I think abortion is wrong” use “Abortion is wrong because….”

No expert has answered this question yet. You can browse … Read More...
PHIL 249 American Pragmatism Assignment 1 Directions: The answers to the essay questions should include a critical analysis and an in depth examination of the issue in question. A critical analysis should NOT be simply an explanation of the arguments or of the view in question but should also include your assessment of whether the author’s arguments are good (i.e. sound or cogent) or bad, and why. It should also include an explanation of your personal view and a philosophical defense of it. Format: The document should have 1-inch margins. The answer should be in Times New Roman size 12 font and double-spaced. Please write out the complete question. The questions can be single-spaced and bold. Please make sure you put your name, the assignment #, the title of the course and the date. Also number your pages. Turning in the Assignment: Students will upload their completed document to Google Drive and share it with me (Dr. Cantens). Please name your assignment “AP-Your Last Name-Assignment 1”. Introduction 1. Explain the general idea of American Pragmatism. What are some of its major themes. Explain at least five of them. Peirce: How To Make Our Ideas Clear (1878) pp. 127-150. 2. In How to Make Our Ideas Clear Peirce introduces a method that he believes if applied properly can clarify both our ideas and our beliefs. Why does he think that this method is important? Describe how the method works. What is the importance of this method for Classical American Philosophy? Can this method be applied to other disciplines? Explain how?

PHIL 249 American Pragmatism Assignment 1 Directions: The answers to the essay questions should include a critical analysis and an in depth examination of the issue in question. A critical analysis should NOT be simply an explanation of the arguments or of the view in question but should also include your assessment of whether the author’s arguments are good (i.e. sound or cogent) or bad, and why. It should also include an explanation of your personal view and a philosophical defense of it. Format: The document should have 1-inch margins. The answer should be in Times New Roman size 12 font and double-spaced. Please write out the complete question. The questions can be single-spaced and bold. Please make sure you put your name, the assignment #, the title of the course and the date. Also number your pages. Turning in the Assignment: Students will upload their completed document to Google Drive and share it with me (Dr. Cantens). Please name your assignment “AP-Your Last Name-Assignment 1”. Introduction 1. Explain the general idea of American Pragmatism. What are some of its major themes. Explain at least five of them. Peirce: How To Make Our Ideas Clear (1878) pp. 127-150. 2. In How to Make Our Ideas Clear Peirce introduces a method that he believes if applied properly can clarify both our ideas and our beliefs. Why does he think that this method is important? Describe how the method works. What is the importance of this method for Classical American Philosophy? Can this method be applied to other disciplines? Explain how?

Whatsapp +919911743277  
Consciously and sub-consciously we have “boxed” leadership in the same way. Looking back we interpret events and interactions, sort out the relevant and important, and apply meaning to the events. This assignment we will use Steve Jobs as our point of focus and our source for leadership events– our retrospective examination of his life as a leader. Assess Jobs as a leader from each perspective: 1. Traits (why traits failed) 2. Style (why style was underutilized) 3. Skills (skills that should have been used) Explain how Jobs’ leadership is explained through the lens of each: 1. Path-Goal 2. LMX 3. Transactional 4. Transformational 5. Charismatic 6. Authentic Non-traditional: 1. Follower (was Jobs a follower, how were followers a part of Jobs’ leadership?) 2. Conclusion (final heading – best represents Jobs and why others were ruled out) • APA format (margins, font, spacing) • APA in-text citations when needed • APA reference page • Proofread for grammar and content • Ensure that all headings and questions are addressed See agenda for headings Remember, this is a detailed analysis. Each of the above (a-j) should be a heading and explain how Jobs, as a leader, represents (or does not represent) the corresponding school of thought. Provide supplemental sources to give your position more credibility, but keep in mind that this is not a biography of Jobs (there are many recent biographies that do not qualify as acceptable sources for this assignment). Finally, which leadership perspective best identifies Steve Jobs as a leader? Explain why, and explain why other options were ruled out (k).

Consciously and sub-consciously we have “boxed” leadership in the same way. Looking back we interpret events and interactions, sort out the relevant and important, and apply meaning to the events. This assignment we will use Steve Jobs as our point of focus and our source for leadership events– our retrospective examination of his life as a leader. Assess Jobs as a leader from each perspective: 1. Traits (why traits failed) 2. Style (why style was underutilized) 3. Skills (skills that should have been used) Explain how Jobs’ leadership is explained through the lens of each: 1. Path-Goal 2. LMX 3. Transactional 4. Transformational 5. Charismatic 6. Authentic Non-traditional: 1. Follower (was Jobs a follower, how were followers a part of Jobs’ leadership?) 2. Conclusion (final heading – best represents Jobs and why others were ruled out) • APA format (margins, font, spacing) • APA in-text citations when needed • APA reference page • Proofread for grammar and content • Ensure that all headings and questions are addressed See agenda for headings Remember, this is a detailed analysis. Each of the above (a-j) should be a heading and explain how Jobs, as a leader, represents (or does not represent) the corresponding school of thought. Provide supplemental sources to give your position more credibility, but keep in mind that this is not a biography of Jobs (there are many recent biographies that do not qualify as acceptable sources for this assignment). Finally, which leadership perspective best identifies Steve Jobs as a leader? Explain why, and explain why other options were ruled out (k).

info@checkyourstudy.com