When company employees fail to realize the importance of the information written down and toss the paperwork in the garbage without shredding, it sets the company up to possibly intrusion due to: Answers: Hacking Sniffer intrusions Dumpster diving Back door intrusions

When company employees fail to realize the importance of the information written down and toss the paperwork in the garbage without shredding, it sets the company up to possibly intrusion due to: Answers: Hacking Sniffer intrusions Dumpster diving Back door intrusions

When company employees fail to realize the importance of the … Read More...
Visit the website: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/space/9909/30/mars.metric.02/ and read about “Metric mishap caused loss of NASA orbiter.” Explain the importance of a universal standard in measurements. Elaborate your answer in terms of metric system and conversions.

Visit the website: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/space/9909/30/mars.metric.02/ and read about “Metric mishap caused loss of NASA orbiter.” Explain the importance of a universal standard in measurements. Elaborate your answer in terms of metric system and conversions.

Importance of a universal standard in measurements A benchmark is … Read More...
Read: http://xnet.kp.org/permanentejournal/winter03/leader.html This article talks about physicians as leaders. It is written by a physician for physicians, so it provides insight into how doctors think of themselves in leadership. How can you use this understanding of doctors and leadership in managing your own healthcare facility? After all, the organizational chart shows the board of directors and CEO at the top, but physicians are just as important in leading any hospital or clinic. How will you integrate physicians as leaders in your own organization?

Read: http://xnet.kp.org/permanentejournal/winter03/leader.html This article talks about physicians as leaders. It is written by a physician for physicians, so it provides insight into how doctors think of themselves in leadership. How can you use this understanding of doctors and leadership in managing your own healthcare facility? After all, the organizational chart shows the board of directors and CEO at the top, but physicians are just as important in leading any hospital or clinic. How will you integrate physicians as leaders in your own organization?

The physicians always take a lead in creating patient-cantered care. … Read More...
3-4 pages typed, double spaced, 12 pt. font, and proper spelling/grammar. Plagiarism will immediately be reported and result in an E grade for the course. Hard copy to be turned in on the last day of class. Describe how Gastrodiplomacy might help countries like Thailand, Korea, India, China, the U.S. and others strategically help trade, foreign relations, and human rights advance globally. Explain how you are participating in Gastrodiplomacy through weekly food selection. Examples could include but aren’t limited to – types of foods you purchase and eat, restaurants you patronize, cookbooks you purchase, food blogs you subscribe to, and ingredients you select. Thoroughly describe at least 3 ways you participate in Gastrodiplomacy. Describe how this class (lecture or lab) has increased your understanding of at least 3 specific aspects of food culture. Describe the importance and significance of these things within their specific region or within your own day to day life. Explain how NUTR 3620 has increased your understanding of global issues as well as your understanding of individuals within those cultures.

3-4 pages typed, double spaced, 12 pt. font, and proper spelling/grammar. Plagiarism will immediately be reported and result in an E grade for the course. Hard copy to be turned in on the last day of class. Describe how Gastrodiplomacy might help countries like Thailand, Korea, India, China, the U.S. and others strategically help trade, foreign relations, and human rights advance globally. Explain how you are participating in Gastrodiplomacy through weekly food selection. Examples could include but aren’t limited to – types of foods you purchase and eat, restaurants you patronize, cookbooks you purchase, food blogs you subscribe to, and ingredients you select. Thoroughly describe at least 3 ways you participate in Gastrodiplomacy. Describe how this class (lecture or lab) has increased your understanding of at least 3 specific aspects of food culture. Describe the importance and significance of these things within their specific region or within your own day to day life. Explain how NUTR 3620 has increased your understanding of global issues as well as your understanding of individuals within those cultures.

info@checkyourstudy.com 3-4 pages typed, double spaced, 12 pt. font, and … Read More...
Explain the relationship between the physical environments and the types of cultures and societies that the various indigenous peoples developed — be sure to use specific examples. Why do you think some Native American societies formed large-scale societies, while most did not? What do the Native American stories in the History 10 Readings reveal about what they valued? (Be sure to refer to the documents by name in your work and explain how the story reveals what they valued. For example, you could say, “In the reading about the Creation of the World, the Zuni saw the importance of both men and women in the roles that Sky-father and Earth-mother play together in determining how their children will find their way in the world by . . . . ” And then use a relevant quote from the story to support your point. ) Unit 3: Unit 1.1: Native Americans – Unit 1 Threaded Discussion 1 You have now read and examined a variety of Native American cultures. Europeans referred to them as “savage” or “uncivilized.” But do cultural differences, shaped by the environments in which people found themselves, make a peoples savage or uncivilized? Unit 1 — Threaded Discussion 1

Explain the relationship between the physical environments and the types of cultures and societies that the various indigenous peoples developed — be sure to use specific examples. Why do you think some Native American societies formed large-scale societies, while most did not? What do the Native American stories in the History 10 Readings reveal about what they valued? (Be sure to refer to the documents by name in your work and explain how the story reveals what they valued. For example, you could say, “In the reading about the Creation of the World, the Zuni saw the importance of both men and women in the roles that Sky-father and Earth-mother play together in determining how their children will find their way in the world by . . . . ” And then use a relevant quote from the story to support your point. ) Unit 3: Unit 1.1: Native Americans – Unit 1 Threaded Discussion 1 You have now read and examined a variety of Native American cultures. Europeans referred to them as “savage” or “uncivilized.” But do cultural differences, shaped by the environments in which people found themselves, make a peoples savage or uncivilized? Unit 1 — Threaded Discussion 1

info@checkyourstudy.com Explain the relationship between the physical environments and the … Read More...
Max Weber introduced the concept of verstehen. How would you use this approach to social research if you wanted to investigate the importance of money to your peers?

Max Weber introduced the concept of verstehen. How would you use this approach to social research if you wanted to investigate the importance of money to your peers?

Verstehen is accepting social behaviour by putting oneself in the … Read More...
The Classic Five-Part Structure 1. Introduce the topic to be argued. Establish its importance. 2. Provide background information so readers will be able to follow your discussion. 3. State your claim (your argumentative thesis) and develop your argument by making a logical appeal. Support your claims with facts, opinions, and examples. If appropriate, mix an emotional appeal or an appeal to authority with your logical appeals. 4. Acknowledge counterarguments and treat them with respect. Rebut these arguments. Reject their evidence or their logic or concede some validity and modify your claim accordingly. Be flexible; you might split the counterarguments and rebut them one at a time at different locations in the paper, or you might begin the paper with a counterargument, rebut it, and then move on to your own claim. 5. Conclude by summarizing the main points of your argument. Then remind readers of what you want them to believe or do. Give them something to remember. The Problem-Solution Structure I. There is a serious problem. A. The problem exists and is growing. (Provide support for argument.) B. The problem is serious. (Provide support.) C. Current methods cannot cope with the problem. (Provide support.) II. There is a solution to the problem. (Your claim goes here.) A. The solution is practical. (Provide support.) B. The solution is desirable. (Provide support.) C. We can implement the solution. (Provide support.) D. Alternate solutions are not as strong as the proposed solution. (Review – and reject – competing solutions.) In both cases, you know before you begin writing whether you will use an inductive (analytic) or deductive (synthetic) arrangement for your argument. The decision to move inductively or deductively is about strategy. Induction moves from support to a claim. Deduction moves from a claim to support – to particular facts, opinions, and examples. This is the preferred form for most writing in the humanities. You can position your claim at the beginning, middle, or end of your presentation. In the problem/solution structure, the claim is made only after the writer introduces a problem. With the five-part structure, you have more flexibility in positioning your claim. One factor that can help determine placement is the likelihood of your audience agreeing with you. When your audience is likely to be neutral or supportive, making your claim early on will not alienate readers (synthetic presentation). When your audience is likely to disagree, placing your thesis at the end of your presentation allows you time to build a consensus, step by step, until you reach your conclusion (analytical presentation).

The Classic Five-Part Structure 1. Introduce the topic to be argued. Establish its importance. 2. Provide background information so readers will be able to follow your discussion. 3. State your claim (your argumentative thesis) and develop your argument by making a logical appeal. Support your claims with facts, opinions, and examples. If appropriate, mix an emotional appeal or an appeal to authority with your logical appeals. 4. Acknowledge counterarguments and treat them with respect. Rebut these arguments. Reject their evidence or their logic or concede some validity and modify your claim accordingly. Be flexible; you might split the counterarguments and rebut them one at a time at different locations in the paper, or you might begin the paper with a counterargument, rebut it, and then move on to your own claim. 5. Conclude by summarizing the main points of your argument. Then remind readers of what you want them to believe or do. Give them something to remember. The Problem-Solution Structure I. There is a serious problem. A. The problem exists and is growing. (Provide support for argument.) B. The problem is serious. (Provide support.) C. Current methods cannot cope with the problem. (Provide support.) II. There is a solution to the problem. (Your claim goes here.) A. The solution is practical. (Provide support.) B. The solution is desirable. (Provide support.) C. We can implement the solution. (Provide support.) D. Alternate solutions are not as strong as the proposed solution. (Review – and reject – competing solutions.) In both cases, you know before you begin writing whether you will use an inductive (analytic) or deductive (synthetic) arrangement for your argument. The decision to move inductively or deductively is about strategy. Induction moves from support to a claim. Deduction moves from a claim to support – to particular facts, opinions, and examples. This is the preferred form for most writing in the humanities. You can position your claim at the beginning, middle, or end of your presentation. In the problem/solution structure, the claim is made only after the writer introduces a problem. With the five-part structure, you have more flexibility in positioning your claim. One factor that can help determine placement is the likelihood of your audience agreeing with you. When your audience is likely to be neutral or supportive, making your claim early on will not alienate readers (synthetic presentation). When your audience is likely to disagree, placing your thesis at the end of your presentation allows you time to build a consensus, step by step, until you reach your conclusion (analytical presentation).

info@checkyourstudy.com
Watch the video, and then answer the questions below. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUF-T5JubDg#t=49 According to the video, which of the three scholars accepted the invasion of Iraq? A. Realists and liberals tended to reject it, but the constructivists thought it was a good idea. B. Realists tended to reject it, but the constructivists and liberals thought it was a good idea. C. Liberals tended to reject it, but the realists and constructivists thought it was a good idea. D. All of the scholars rejected it. E. None of the scholars rejected it. Which of the following was NOT given as a reason to be concerned about the war in Iraq? A. First and foremost, peace needed to prevail. B. The invasion was form of moralizing or crusading. C. The invasion undermined respect for International law. D. The invasion didn’t serve clear U.S. interests. E. The situation had the potential to become a quagmire. In the video, one of the topics under discussion concerns democratic governance. How much do their views conflict? A. Caleb Gallemore and J.D. Bowen disagree, because democracy is a social construct. B. Randall Schweller and J.D. Bowen disagree, because one side believes that democracy is impossible to spread while the other thinks it may be possible. C. Randall Schweller and Caleb Gallemore disagree with J.D. Bowen, because the first two view the attempt to spread democracy as a moralizing crusade. D. J.D. Bowen and Randall Schweller disagree with Caleb Gallemore, who doesn’t think that democracy can be spread successfully. E. All of the authors agree on the possibility of establishing democracy in Iraq. What sorts of things were on the minds of constructivists considering the war in Iraq? A. the history of colonialism, tensions between Islam and the West, and the United States’ perceived role as a world leader B. whether the war served U.S. interests C. whether the Coalition of the Willing would have forces sufficient to topple Saddam Hussein D. the likelihood that the war would result in a quagmire E. the importance of promoting human rights Professor Bowen says that liberals disagreed about invading Iraq but agreed on the form of government to be established there. What was that form of government? A. a loose confederacy of tribes B. a constitutional monarchy with negotiated rights for minorities C. a communist dictatorship with religious tolerance D. a democracy with respect for human rights E. a long-term military installation with UN forces overseeing government functions

Watch the video, and then answer the questions below. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUF-T5JubDg#t=49 According to the video, which of the three scholars accepted the invasion of Iraq? A. Realists and liberals tended to reject it, but the constructivists thought it was a good idea. B. Realists tended to reject it, but the constructivists and liberals thought it was a good idea. C. Liberals tended to reject it, but the realists and constructivists thought it was a good idea. D. All of the scholars rejected it. E. None of the scholars rejected it. Which of the following was NOT given as a reason to be concerned about the war in Iraq? A. First and foremost, peace needed to prevail. B. The invasion was form of moralizing or crusading. C. The invasion undermined respect for International law. D. The invasion didn’t serve clear U.S. interests. E. The situation had the potential to become a quagmire. In the video, one of the topics under discussion concerns democratic governance. How much do their views conflict? A. Caleb Gallemore and J.D. Bowen disagree, because democracy is a social construct. B. Randall Schweller and J.D. Bowen disagree, because one side believes that democracy is impossible to spread while the other thinks it may be possible. C. Randall Schweller and Caleb Gallemore disagree with J.D. Bowen, because the first two view the attempt to spread democracy as a moralizing crusade. D. J.D. Bowen and Randall Schweller disagree with Caleb Gallemore, who doesn’t think that democracy can be spread successfully. E. All of the authors agree on the possibility of establishing democracy in Iraq. What sorts of things were on the minds of constructivists considering the war in Iraq? A. the history of colonialism, tensions between Islam and the West, and the United States’ perceived role as a world leader B. whether the war served U.S. interests C. whether the Coalition of the Willing would have forces sufficient to topple Saddam Hussein D. the likelihood that the war would result in a quagmire E. the importance of promoting human rights Professor Bowen says that liberals disagreed about invading Iraq but agreed on the form of government to be established there. What was that form of government? A. a loose confederacy of tribes B. a constitutional monarchy with negotiated rights for minorities C. a communist dictatorship with religious tolerance D. a democracy with respect for human rights E. a long-term military installation with UN forces overseeing government functions

Watch the video, and then answer the questions below. According … Read More...