Sex, Gender, and Popular Culture Spring 2015 Look through popular magazines, and see if you can find advertisements that objectify women in order to sell a product. Alternately, you may use an advertisement on television (but make sure to provide a link to the ad so I can see it!). Study these images then write a paper about objectification that deals with all or some of the following: • What effect(s), if any, do you think the objectification of women’s bodies has on our culture? • Jean Kilbourne states “turning a human being into a thing is almost always the first step toward justifying violence against that person.” What do you think she means by this? Do you agree with her reasoning? Why or why not? • Some people would argue that depicting a woman’s body as an object is a form of art. What is your opinion of this point of view? Explain your reasoning. • Why do you think that women are objectified more often than men are? • How does sexualization and objectification play out differently across racial lines? • Kilbourne explains that the consequences of being objectified are different – and more serious – for women than for men. Do you agree? How is the world different for women than it is for men? How do objectified images of women interact with those in our culture differently from the way images of men do? Why is it important to look at images in the context of the culture? • What is the difference between sexual objectification and sexual subjectification? (Ros Gill ) • How do ads construct violent white masculinity and how does that vision of masculinity hurt both men and women? Throughout your written analysis, be sure to make clear and specific reference to the images you selected, and please submit these images with your paper. Make sure you engage with and reference to at least 4 of the following authors: Kilbourne, Bordo, Hunter & Soto, Rose, Durham, Gill, Katz, Schuchardt, Ono and Buescher. Guidelines:  Keep your content focused on structural, systemic, institutional factors rather than the individual: BE ANALYTICAL NOT ANECDOTAL.  Avoid using the first person or including personal stories/reactions. You must make sure to actively engage with your readings: these essays need to be informed and framed by the theoretical material you have been reading this semester.  Keep within the 4-6 page limit; use 12-point font, double spacing and 1-inch margins.  Use formal writing conventions (introduction/thesis statement, body, conclusion) and correct grammar. Resources may be cited within the text of your paper, i.e. (Walters, 2013).

Sex, Gender, and Popular Culture Spring 2015 Look through popular magazines, and see if you can find advertisements that objectify women in order to sell a product. Alternately, you may use an advertisement on television (but make sure to provide a link to the ad so I can see it!). Study these images then write a paper about objectification that deals with all or some of the following: • What effect(s), if any, do you think the objectification of women’s bodies has on our culture? • Jean Kilbourne states “turning a human being into a thing is almost always the first step toward justifying violence against that person.” What do you think she means by this? Do you agree with her reasoning? Why or why not? • Some people would argue that depicting a woman’s body as an object is a form of art. What is your opinion of this point of view? Explain your reasoning. • Why do you think that women are objectified more often than men are? • How does sexualization and objectification play out differently across racial lines? • Kilbourne explains that the consequences of being objectified are different – and more serious – for women than for men. Do you agree? How is the world different for women than it is for men? How do objectified images of women interact with those in our culture differently from the way images of men do? Why is it important to look at images in the context of the culture? • What is the difference between sexual objectification and sexual subjectification? (Ros Gill ) • How do ads construct violent white masculinity and how does that vision of masculinity hurt both men and women? Throughout your written analysis, be sure to make clear and specific reference to the images you selected, and please submit these images with your paper. Make sure you engage with and reference to at least 4 of the following authors: Kilbourne, Bordo, Hunter & Soto, Rose, Durham, Gill, Katz, Schuchardt, Ono and Buescher. Guidelines:  Keep your content focused on structural, systemic, institutional factors rather than the individual: BE ANALYTICAL NOT ANECDOTAL.  Avoid using the first person or including personal stories/reactions. You must make sure to actively engage with your readings: these essays need to be informed and framed by the theoretical material you have been reading this semester.  Keep within the 4-6 page limit; use 12-point font, double spacing and 1-inch margins.  Use formal writing conventions (introduction/thesis statement, body, conclusion) and correct grammar. Resources may be cited within the text of your paper, i.e. (Walters, 2013).

The objectification of women has been a very controversial topic … Read More...
Vulnerability of [NAME OF PLANT] At-Risk Score: [NUMBER] Described by [Your Name] Scored by [Name of past student] Background Write here about the how the plants is (and has been used) and anything else generally interesting about it. Use parenthetical (Author, Year) notation following Pechenik to note sources of information. End the background section with the score of the plant and a subtle (or not so subtle) transition to why the plant scored as it did, as broken down by subscore, emphasizing which sub-score makes it most vulnerable. Life History Score [Life History Subscore] Explain, in words, why the plant has the score it does for life history. Document following Pechenik. Effects of Harvest on Individuals [Subscore] Explain, in words, why the plant has the score it does for Effects of Harvest on Individuals. Document following Pechenik. Population Size [Subscore] Explain, in words, why the plant has the score it does for population size. Document following Pechenik. Include referenced figures (e.g. range maps) if they illustrate the point. Habitat [Subscore] Explain, in words, why the plant has the score it does for habitat. Document following Pechenik. Include referenced figures (e.g. maps of habitat loss) if they illustrate the point. Demand [Subscore] Explain, in words, why the plant has the score it does for demand. Document following Pechenik. Include referenced figures (e.g. graphs of changes in value or demand) if they illustrate the point. Special Considerations Describe any information that did not fit in the above that might make the plant more or less vulnerable. Also include information about conditions that could change that would warrant the plant being reassessed. References [List references alphabetically by first word following Pechenik] SAVE THE DOCUMENT WITH the title [Genus] score description by [your last name] 2017

Vulnerability of [NAME OF PLANT] At-Risk Score: [NUMBER] Described by [Your Name] Scored by [Name of past student] Background Write here about the how the plants is (and has been used) and anything else generally interesting about it. Use parenthetical (Author, Year) notation following Pechenik to note sources of information. End the background section with the score of the plant and a subtle (or not so subtle) transition to why the plant scored as it did, as broken down by subscore, emphasizing which sub-score makes it most vulnerable. Life History Score [Life History Subscore] Explain, in words, why the plant has the score it does for life history. Document following Pechenik. Effects of Harvest on Individuals [Subscore] Explain, in words, why the plant has the score it does for Effects of Harvest on Individuals. Document following Pechenik. Population Size [Subscore] Explain, in words, why the plant has the score it does for population size. Document following Pechenik. Include referenced figures (e.g. range maps) if they illustrate the point. Habitat [Subscore] Explain, in words, why the plant has the score it does for habitat. Document following Pechenik. Include referenced figures (e.g. maps of habitat loss) if they illustrate the point. Demand [Subscore] Explain, in words, why the plant has the score it does for demand. Document following Pechenik. Include referenced figures (e.g. graphs of changes in value or demand) if they illustrate the point. Special Considerations Describe any information that did not fit in the above that might make the plant more or less vulnerable. Also include information about conditions that could change that would warrant the plant being reassessed. References [List references alphabetically by first word following Pechenik] SAVE THE DOCUMENT WITH the title [Genus] score description by [your last name] 2017

checkyourstudy.com Whatsapp +919891515290